The background to everything else here — the earlier passes at this problem, kept live at their own addresses. They are worth a look for one specific reason: the colour combinations in them are often lovely. What they got wrong was the logic underneath — there was no proper model of what physically sits together or what can actually be carried where, so some of the pairings are beautiful and impossible. That is the thing the current pages fixed. The colour instincts largely survived.
Start with the pairings if you only open one — it holds 249 combinations with both objects photographed, and its layout is the one carried forward into the current work.
Ten colour directions built from your 53 hex picks, each with five colours in roles, a written argument, an honest note on what is wrong with it, and a full contrast table.
249 object-to-object combinations, each anchor paired with two or three matches, with photographs of both objects and the harmony reasoning stated.
Ten directions built before your shortlist existed, labelled on the cover as missing the most important variable.
The first palette round, built straight off three deep-research reports and the OKLCh harmony analysis.
The current work is at the library, staging, combinations, the palette directions, colours not on site yet, the alignment page and the palette studio.
These archived pages were built on the colour data as it stood before deduplication and before the item taxonomy existed, so some of them show the same reading twice and some propose moves that are not physically possible. That is why they were replaced — but the ideas in them are still good, and that is why they are still here.